Risks and Challenges to Young People on the Internet

Risks and Ch all in allenges to Young People on the networkChildren on the meshingOverviewNowadays, the lucre has become a fundamental facial expression of our lives over recent epoch years and its becoming integral part of our life to a fault its considered as an increasing role of todays culture , especially for children and teen get on withrs, opening us up to a whole globe of knowledge. For whom school work, online romp, social networking, entertainment and parley are among the most popular activities. However, the lack of common concord about the right overture to educating and encourageing children adds further challenges to kids online experience and reflection. Additionally, pagan and geographical differences in legal and social norms reflect the fact that at that place is no universally accepted view of what defines a person as a child or what is appropriate for children, making inappropriate field and behavior difficult to recognize. While some online crimes are cr oss-border in nature and so accept global attention, at a national level, policy approaches to regulating content have so far predominantly employed a range of filtering techniques to detain access to or block Internet content1.The Internet can be a risky spot for the unwary, particularly children, containing undesired contact includes harassment, cyberbullying, stalking and so forth In the meantime, most of the parents are worried about the dangers their children could face on the meshwork. The most important challenge for all parents is to teach themselves and their youngsters about how to utilize the Internet securely. On the other hand, to help kids maximizing the Internets public assistances and minimizing the risks parents should teach their kids to stay safe online and should only make contact with people they already know and not find personal information about themselves online without a parents permission, includes their full name, email address, postal address, phone number, photo, school address etc.In addition, parents should remain in contiguous touch with their children as they explore the profit to keep them safe and one of the most popular solutions is to install safety software on the parents computer so that they can restrict their childs online activities to approved websites.History and BackgroundAlmost 40 years ago, the US Defense Department first mark the stage for the Internet with a network that was called ARPANET. This was a research program that was begun to discover new fashions to link different networks together for government and scientific manipulation2. What they hoped to develop was a method of communicating information packets among m both computers at the same time. By years this networks get larger with more than developed methods and protocols and the networks that resulted became cognize by the shortened form, the Internet.Now a days, internet is available everywhere and its one of the important things that li fe cant complete without it makes our life more easier and fast. But in the other hand, everything have the dark side and problems. In this case we are interested in the children and the effect of the internet on them. Children use up Internet for many needs such as educational, entertainment and social media needs. Many organizations been published for serving safe internet for children for example Childrens Internet security system Act (CIPA) that been signed into law on December 21, 20003, they use Internet filters and implement other measures to protect children from harmful online content.Issue selectionAvailability of not appropriate framework on internet.Contact with Strangers people (who seek to abuse children)Privacy risks from game sitesAvailability of not appropriate material on internetFirstly, the meaning of children are the people under the age of fifteen years old and here we mean by the Not appropriate materials is a material which is unsuitable for children gener ally. From multiple points of view the Internet is similar to a huge library, both have substance to teach and entertain, Furthermore, like the substance in a library, not all Internets content is appropriate for children. Libraries seduce childrens and youthful adults sections in order to help youths and their parents to distinguish which materials are fitting for them. However, on the internet, all of the not appropriate content may be equally accessible for all different ages.ArgumentsThere is a general whimsey refers to benefit of governments effect of filtering internet of inappropriate materialResearchers at the Oxford Internet Institute recognition of the benefits of the control of information on the Internet and Web is certainly feasible, and technological advances do not therefore guarantee greater freedom of speech.(UNESCO,2010)4These some opinions support the previous opinionGovernments should filter and blackball explicit or profane websites, since there is currently very little that prevents children from accessing these sites. ( Efrain).Childrens Internet Protection Act (CIPA) requires that K-12 schools and libraries in the United States use Internet filters and implement other measures to protect children from harmful online content as a condition for federal funding(United States Supreme Court on June 23, 2003). payoff argumentsThere is a general opinion advocated for eliminate of governments attain of filtering internet of inappropriate materialFather of the Internet Vint Cerf stated that he sees government control of the Internet failing because the Web is almost entirely privately possess (November, 2007)4These some opinions support the previous opinionHuman rights denied it is simply a basic human right guaranteed bill of rights to every citizen.The government should not censor the Internet no matter the content because it infringes upon free speech.AnalysesSocial Contract TheoryAction Governments is filtering the internet of inappropr iate content.Agents Citizens, governments.Rights Free of speech right. compendium is it logically acceptable? No the government cant catch everything on internet, people have the right to free speech, government could block non-pornographic web pages that contain scientific facts just because of victimisation similar words. its violating one of the rights so,(The action is wrong.)Rule UtilitarianismProposed Rule Every government is filtering the internet of inappropriate content.BenefitLess number of children will be exposed to unwanted or harmful materials.More parents will be relief if their childs use the internet.HarmsSome of the non-pornographic sites is filteredConclusion The weights of benefits exceed the harms. So the action right.Our opinionIn this issue we prefer that government establish a filtering to inappropriate material. Because we see this as the right action that could protect many children and childishness around the world.Contact with Strangers people (who seek to abuse children)Firstly, the meaning of Strangers is who is neither a friend nor an acquaintance.Abuse and neglect are forms of maltreatment of a child. someone may abuse or neglect a child by inflicting harm or by failing to act to prevent harm. Children may be maltreated by those known to them or more rarely, by a stranger for example, via the internet. They may be abused by an adult or adults, or another child or children. 3ArgumentsThis application support contacting children with strangerswhatsApp application dont ask about the age, as Koum said We designed our system to be as anonymous as possible. Were not advertisement-driven so we dont need personal databases so they dont give attention to children that may be abused from strangers 7Counter argumentsApplication advocated for eliminate of contacting children with strangersmany social application in App Store take into account the age of the user , as the apple inspection guidelines mentions Apps may ask for date of bir th (or use other age-gating mechanisms) only for the purpose of complying with applicable childrens privacy statutes, but must include some effectual functionality or entertainment value regardless of the users age 8AnalysesKantianism Theory1st preparationAction social applications ask the user about his/her age to protect children from strangers.Proposed Rule every social application ask the user about his/her age.Analysis is logically acceptable? Yes, parents will feel secure to let their children use internet without being abused. And its not annoying thing for singles.(The action is right)2nd Formulation finishing (end) Protecting children from strangers.Mean there is no mean to end.Analysis as long there is no mean to end.(The action is right).Social Contract TheoryAgents user, application providerRights asking about the user age doesnt conflict the user privacy as long as its not asking about real name, ID and another detail information.(The action is right)Our opinion it is honourable for social applications to ask the user about his/her age to protect children from strangers because in the end our first care and matter is to serve a save internet environment that is clean from abusing and neglect children.Privacy risks from game sitesOnline gaming has attracted lots of children over the past years. People spend allot of time in preliminary of their computers playing their favorite games. Therefore, Privacy considered as one of the most complex legal issues that faceour society, many sites, such as sties that is interested in a gaming and playing games have little interest in actively profiling their users or discovering personal information about them However, these sites will often collect epoch-making amounts of personal data that may trigger liability risks. Moreover, A lot of choices exist in todays online gaming environment, most allow players to create online identities as game identifier and most of the game sites take the advantage of thes e information in real world for example selling these personal information in market.ArgumentsOnline Gaming has become a major source of entertainment and revenue generation by inventing a fishing ground for online predators and malicious hackers to gain more illicit profit from targeting the children (Hayes, 2008).5A survey conducted by Federal profession Commission (FTC) in 1998 supporting that 89% of websites targeted children to collect personal information (Sandwig, 2003).5Counter argumentsChildren should also be encouraged to interact and discuss with their parents, the various issues they face while accessing internet and especially while giving private information to any personal or organization6 and parent should also take the full responsibility of using their children the game sites that require filling personal information.AnalysesKantianism Theory1st FormulationAction Games sites sell the chilled personal information to third-party partners.Proposed Rule Every online g ames sties ask children for extensive personal and family information for marketing purposes.Analysis is it logically acceptable? No, its wholly not acceptable because these websites are taking the advantage of naivety of children to collect their personal information without their parent permeation, so the action is wrong.2nd FormulationGoal (end) Profiteering from the personal information of the children.Mean yes, they use the child naivety as a means to their end which is selling the personal information and take benefit from it.Social Contract TheoryAgent Game site creator- children.Right They violated the privacy right which is considered as prudential right, so the action is wrong.Our opinionIn this issue is that we consider it as not moral because no one have the right to expose someone personal information or use it in any way.Summary and ConclusionAs conclusion, we believe that everything in world has good and bad side but its also deepened on the way that how people use i t or how people can take the maximum advantages form it. When considering potential benefits and harms of children using the internet, the parents will be the most prudent to be on the positive impacts on childrens learning and take the ability and teach their children how to take responsibility and use the internet in way that will return benefit to them.Finally, we agree that using the internet can benefit childrens education and social development, but children sometimes will be in risk of exposing to inappropriate material that is hateful, or violent in nature, or encourages activities that are dangerous or illegal, However, can we arrange to have benefits without risks of using children the internet, like we mention above its all depend on the parents in the first place and how they will going to take the full responsibility their children.References1 internetsociety . (Feb 8, 2014).Children and the Internet.Available http//www.internetsociety.org/sites/ omission/files/bp-chil drenandtheinternet-20129017-en.pdf2 The kids wendo. (Sept 2000) history of the internet. Availablehttp//www.thekidswindow.co.uk/News/Internet_History.htm3Wikipedia . (Paris, 2011). Childrens Internet Protection Act.Availablehttp//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childrens_Internet_Protection_Act4 Wikipedia . (Jaeger, 2009).Internet censorship.Availablehttp//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorshipcite_note-UNESCO-2011-35 North Yorkshire Safeguarding Children Board (May, 2014).What is child abuse.Availablehttp//www.safeguardingchildren.co.uk/section-1.html6 UKessays. (April, 2012).Children On The Internet Media Essay.Availablehttp//www.ukessays.com/essays/media/children-on-the-internet-media-essay.php7 Epic (Federal Trade Commission March 6, 2014) In the Matter of WhatsApp, Inc. .Availablehttps//epic.org/privacy/ftc/whatsapp/WhatsApp-Complaint.pdf8 Apple . (April, 2014). Availablehttps//developer.apple.com/app-store/review/